Deal simulation and gross-to-net
Model a contract's net revenue, fees, and Medicaid and 340B exposure before signing; see where a deeper discount stops paying.
Pharma · Biotech · Medtech · Distributors
I'm Francis Ruffy. I model the gross-to-net effect of contracts and fix how rebates, chargebacks and fees are processed, inside the systems you already run. AI checks the work; your team signs off on every payment.
Fixed-fee 2-week Assess · No new platform to license · I reply within one business day
Why a 28% discount can lose $1.18M
Sample quarter
I built a quarter of synthetic channel data for a fictional $500M specialty manufacturer and ran my checks on it. Drag the slider to see rate-based results at your size.
Money not paid out and new revenue are different kinds of value, so I don't add them up. The contract decision below is a third kind.
Why: at 28%, the contract price sets a new Medicaid Best Price, raising the rebate on every Medicaid unit and lowering the 340B ceiling price on every 340B unit. At 26%, Best Price doesn't move. The difference on one decision: $1.7M. Illustrative, fictional data.
Tap a row for its definition.
Medtech: no government rows; add GPO admin fees, tier rebates and capital-and-consumables bundles. Distributors: it becomes chargeback receivables: claimed, credited and still open.
That's the 2-week Assess: fixed fee, scoped in writing.
Updated November 2026 · For drug and biologic manufacturers
Negotiated prices for 10 Part D drugs took effect January 1, 2026, with 15 more in 2027 and 15, including Part B drugs, in 2028. Manufacturers have 14 days to pay or confirm each refund.
It replaced the Coverage Gap Discount Program in 2025. For specified manufacturers (on low-income-subsidy utilization) and specified small manufacturers, discounts phase in through 2031, and accruals and invoices must track it.
HRSA approved plans from 10 manufacturers for 21 drugs, starting January 1, 2027, with 10 days to pay or deny each claim. Hospital groups sued on October 9, 2026; the same court blocked the first pilot in December 2025. If it proceeds, every claim needs validation in that window.
Most firms model the deal or process the claims. I do both, and fix the process in between.
Model a contract's net revenue, fees, and Medicaid and 340B exposure before signing; see where a deeper discount stops paying.
GPO, IDN, managed-care and wholesaler programs: contract-price loads (845), chargebacks (844/849), 867 tracing, rebate and admin-fee calculations, and GL-tied accruals. Your team signs off on payment.
Includes 40+ life-sciences rebate structures with stacking rules.
Effective-dated GPO rosters, tiers, IDN hierarchies and 340B registration: every claim checked against eligibility on the sale date, plus eligible accounts not buying.
Medicaid (AMP, Best Price, URA), 340B ceiling price, VA FSS, Non-FAMP, FCP, Tricare and Part B ASP: calculations, methodology, restatements and the audit file. You certify and submit.
MDP invoices, phase-in tracking and accruals; MFP effectuation, refund reconciliation and MFP/340B nonduplication; Part B and Part D inflation-rebate accruals.
Find 340B/Medicaid duplicate discounts and 340B units in commercial and Part D claims; build the file for good-faith resolution, audit and dispute resolution.
Accelerators come prebuilt and run inside the platform you already use. Target time to a first live program: 10 to 14 weeks, set in the Assess scope.
Medicaid, 340B, Tricare, ASP and the IRA apply to drugs and biologics only. Everything else applies to all four segments, medtech and distributors included.
How I use AI
AI agents read contracts, review exceptions and explain why gross-to-net moved. Every number comes from auditable rules. Nothing is paid, posted or signed without your team's sign-off.
Assess · Build · Run
Then keep me on for the build, the period work, or neither.
The Assess shows which step you're on and what pays back first.
01 · Assess · 2 weeks · Fixed fee
What a proposed contract does to net and statutory prices, and what would block a clean close.
You get A deal-impact model, a findings memo and a ranked fix list.
02 · Build
I design and build the workflow in your tools, then hand it to your team.
You get Calculation, accrual or eligibility workflows with controls, a test log and a runbook your team can use without me.
03 · Run · Monthly or quarterly
Claim validation, disputes and accruals every period. You approve and release payment.
You get Validated claims, a GL-tied accrual roll-forward and a close package auditors can follow.
Built on the fictional Larchmere data above.
Sample · fictional data
Findings memo · Larchmere Specialty Pharma (fictional)
2-week Assess · effects at $500M gross
| Finding | Effect | Owner | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chargebacks at the wrong GPO price, or for sites off the roster or 340B registry | $1.5M a year not owed | Contract operations | Date-effective roster and registry check before credit |
| Proposed 28% contract sets a new Medicaid Best Price | −$1.18M first year; +$512K at 26% | Pricing and government pricing | Best Price check in deal approval |
| 70 sites eligible through their GPO but not buying | ≈$3.5M a year net sales | Field and trade | Target list by GPO and IDN |
Pricing, contracting, finance, trade and market-access teams at pharma, biotech and medtech manufacturers and at distributors. For medtech: contract pricing, GPO and IDN tiers, admin fees, rebates, chargebacks, accruals and VA FSS (Medicaid, 340B, ASP and the IRA apply to drugs and biologics, not devices). For distributors: contract-price loads, chargeback submission and reconciliation, GPO/IDN eligibility and the EDI 844/849/867 flows with your manufacturers.
I do. The person who scopes your engagement is the person who delivers it. Run work is built so your team can operate it without me: runbooks, controls and models live in your systems from the start, and nothing depends on access only I have.
The 2-week Assess is a fixed fee, quoted in writing after our call. Build and Run are scoped in writing from what the Assess finds, before any work starts. I don't publish prices because scope drives them.
For the Assess: the contract terms in scope, a recent period of chargeback and rebate data, and time with the people who run them. Read-only access or extracts are fine.
I work in your environment, on accounts you issue and can revoke, so your data stays under your controls. Client names, figures and materials stay confidential. I'll complete your security questionnaire.
Yes. I'll sign your NDA before any data is shared and work through your MSA and vendor onboarding. Beiusis LLC is a one-person firm, so tell me early if your process needs anything beyond that, and I'll say straight away whether I can meet it.
No license to buy. Accelerators come with the engagement and run in the platform you already use. If I ever offer something separately, I'll tell you up front, and no engagement will require it.
Contact
Tell me what you're working on.